The deal has no budget or owner. Keep it in the forecast?
A Quayline prospect has accepted three demos. It has no approved project, no budget and no owner willing to sponsor a decision.
The question
The seller has promised another custom demo. Your task is to decide whether more selling effort is justified.
- ContactInteresting technology. We are collecting ideas for next year.
- ContactNo one owns a purchase decision. We cannot introduce finance or operations.
- Seller noteThree demos completed. Custom demo requested for Friday.
- Delivery teamThe custom demo would use two days of work.
“Choose the opportunity status, explain the stop condition, and write the next message to the contact.”
Not saved by this site. Your browser may restore text when you navigate back.
A strong answer, step by step
Open each step in turn. This is one strong answer, not the only one.
Step 1: Read the absence of a project
What would you do here? Open the move you’d make.
Use demo count as buying intent
Tempting, but it misses something. More demonstrations do not create an approved project.
Separate interest from a purchase
The strong move. Buyer activity has to connect to a buying process.
See how a strong candidate says it
“Three demos establish engagement with the product, not a funded problem. There is no owner, priority or route to a decision in the record.”
Why it works: Buyer activity has to connect to a buying process.
Step 2: Stop unearned custom work
What would you do here? Open the move you’d make.
Pause the custom demo
The strong move. The current evidence does not justify additional delivery effort.
Use another tailored demo to find a sponsor
Tempting, but it misses something. A fourth demo repeats activity without filling the qualification gap.
See how a strong candidate says it
“I would stop the two-day custom build. Before more tailored work, we need a named problem owner and a reason to evaluate a purchase.”
Why it works: The current evidence does not justify additional delivery effort.
Step 3: Close the forecast honestly
What would you do here? Open the move you’d make.
Keep the opportunity open until the next demo
Tempting, but it misses something. Pipeline coverage is misleading when dates and ownership are invented.
Remove it from the active forecast
The strong move. The record must reflect the lack of a current buying decision.
See how a strong candidate says it
“I would remove it from the active purchase forecast and record the reason. If our process supports a nurture state, I would use it without inventing a close date.”
Why it works: The record must reflect the lack of a current buying decision.
Step 4: Leave a useful return condition
What would you do here? Open the move you’d make.
Agree what could reopen the deal
The strong move. A respectful stop can preserve a future relationship.
Tell the contact they are not serious
Tempting, but it misses something. A personal judgment about the contact does not explain the commercial boundary.
See how a strong candidate says it
“We are glad the ideas were useful. A custom evaluation makes sense when there is a problem owner and an active decision to make. If that changes, let us reconnect around a specific workflow and approval path.”
Why it works: A respectful stop can preserve a future relationship.
The answer, in short
- Decision
- Disqualify the current purchase opportunity and pause custom work.
- Because
- There is interest but no owner, funded problem or accessible decision path.
- What would change it
- A named owner, material problem and credible buying process could justify reopening.
Common traps
- Confusing demo count with qualified pipeline.
- Calling a prospect unserious rather than stating the missing evidence.
Check your answer
- Did you distinguish interest from a project?
- Did you stop the two-day custom build?
- Did you remove unsupported forecast timing?
- Did you give a clear, respectful return condition?
Last reviewed Nov 10, 2026